The Landworkers’ Alliance is a union of farmers, growers, foresters and land-based workers.

Feedback for us

If you have any comments, critiques, considerations, compliments, complaints, about anything the Landworkers Alliance is or isn’t up to, do let us know your thought. We love feedback, it keeps a system healthy. Please fill in this quick form.

Membership / Supporter / Donation Queries

Please contact Lauren.Simpson@staging.landworkersalliance.org.uk

Requests for work, volunteering or internships

We are currently not recruiting for any roles but please read our newsletters for any announcements. We currently do not offer any volunteer or internship placements directly with the LWA, but keep an eye out in the newsletter or on the forum for any members looking for volunteers or workers.

Academic/Research Enquiries

Please look at the Agroecology Research Collaboration to see if it fits your area of research/work.

Membership Support / Advice

Currently the LWA does not have capacity or resources to help individual members or potential members on their specific projects, farms or programmes. We get a lot of requests for individual support and would love to have the time to respond to each request in full. We are fundraising for a new role for somebody to focus on membership support and services as we have identified it is a gap in our offering so please watch this space. Having said that, if your query is critical and urgent please email info@staging.landworkersalliance.org.uk including the word URGENT in the subject header and it will get picked up and we can try our best to help.

Contacting Individual Staff

Please take the time to explore our staff page here to see who the most relevant contact for your enquiry is.

Our addresses format is firstname.lastname@staging.landworkersalliance.org.uk

Please bear in mind we all work part time and have limited capacity to respond to enquiries outside our core areas of work.

You can also find information under the About Us header about branch and regional organising, and identity groups within the LWA membership.

Press/Media Enquiries:

For any queries relating to press please email press@staging.landworkersalliance.org.uk

Merchandise/calendar Enquiries

For any enquiries to do with shop sales including the calendar please email merchandise@staging.landworkersalliance.org.uk

To Include an Item in Our Newsletter:

You can fill in this quick form to submit it to be included in the next bulletin/newsletter. The deadline to submit is the end of Friday each week for the following week’s member bulletin. With the same form you can also submit to the monthly non-member newsletter which goes out in the first week of the month.

All Other Enquiries:

For any other enquiries that are URGENT please email info@staging.landworkersalliance.org.uk with the word ‘urgent’ in the subject header and we will do our best to help.

Follow Us

UK-Australia trade deal: Reorienting in the wrong direction

UK-AUSTRALIA TRADE DEAL: REORIENTING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION
24/06/2021 Yali Banton Heath

Last week UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Australian PM Scott Morrison elbow-bumped on an ‘agreement in principle’ for a future of free trade between the two countries, despite the prospect of such a deal generating major backlash from British farmers.

 

The UK Government claims that the transition to a zero-tariff trade deal will ultimately save British consumers up to £34 million a year; which equates to a measly 52p per person. Although this is little more than pocket-money in real terms, the potential cost to British farmers – especially small-scale agroecological food producers who value high standards, fair prices and small supply chains- could be huge. 

Farmers fear that they face being undercut by cheaper imports from large-scale farms in Australia, who are held to far lower production standards than their UK counterparts. Rebecca Laughton, a member of the campaigns team at LWA, put it simply: “In a country like the UK, which has plentiful rainfall and grows great grass, how can it be sensible or sustainable to undercut our beef and sheep farmers by allowing cheap imports of Australian meat?”

 

Futile safeguards 

In an attempt to soothe concerns, the Government has reassured British farmers that they will be protected by a cap on tariff-free imports for the first 15 years, through the implementation of tariff-quotas and other (yet to be defined) safeguards. 

According to figures released by the Australian Government, however, beef tariff-quotas will rise from 5,000 tonnes as they currently stand, to 35,000 tonnes as soon as the deal is signed. This amount will then continue to rise over the 15 year transition period. But in 2019, UK beef and veal imports from Australia only amounted to 1,766 tonnes – well below even the current cap. Understandably, there are concerns that these caps are therefore nowhere near low enough, and will actually place no meaningful limit on tariff-free imports in the future, with such high caps only serving to suggest that overall meat imports are likely to increase.

 

Concerns over standards

Although there is still a lack of detail, the deal’s ‘agreement in principle’ leaves uncomfortable scope for the dismantling of UK food standards. The UK Government has promised to uphold UK food standards, so no hormone-fed beef for example, but this far from the only concern. Australia is far more relaxed in its use of antibiotics, for example, and the liberal use of antibiotics in their meat and poultry production means that animals are packed more tightly together, and animal welfare standards are severely compromised as a result. 

There are also fears, expressed by Pesticide Action Network UK among others, that the deal will weaken UK pesticide standards. One example might be the import of foodstuffs that contain residues of the toxic herbicide paraquat; a chemical which is used on crops in Australia but is banned for use in the UK due to the serious risks it poses to human health and the environment. 

 

Reorienting in the wrong direction

Although the 15 year transition period may soften the immediate blow for UK food producers, this transition period is intended to encourage farmers to ‘adapt’ to the new changes. Farmers will essentially be expected to adapt, or die, and adaptation in this case means reorienting production towards an export market. 

As the UK Government said in its statement: “We are also supporting agricultural producers to increase their exports overseas, including to new markets in the Indo-Pacific.” But the LWA maintains that undercutting domestic markets while transitioning UK food producers towards export-oriented production is the wrong way to go. 

Jyoti Fernandes, head of policy for the LWA commented: “Exports massively increase the carbon footprint of food at a critical time for reducing transportation and refrigeration emissions. Why should we be importing beef from the other side of the world when we should be selling the highest standard beef to our local communities, pubs, schools and hospitals?

 

Local food systems are the answer

Now more than ever there is an urgent need to buttress local food economies. The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed weaknesses in our over-reliance on long supply chains which rely on international trade, and has served as a harsh yet serious reminder of the importance of local food supply systems in meeting domestic needs. 

The need for shorter supply chains is further compounded by the fact that we are living in a state of climate emergency. Importing food from other countries – especially as far away as Australia – will only serve to increase greenhouse gas emissions, contradicting any government claims that they are ‘tackling climate change head on’. 

The resistance to this free trade deal, and the others that are likely to follow in its footsteps, must be firmly rooted in a wider demand to transition away from long supply chains, and a need to ground food production in localised, agroecologically produced food systems which value local producers, animal welfare and environmental integrity. 

 

The LWA recently launched its Vocal for Local report, which outlines the benefits of decentralised local food systems in six key areas: economy, waste, environment, food justice, culture and health. You can read it here.

Please subscribe to our e-newsletter.

This information will never be shared with a third party